A brand new examine on employee productiveness is attracting buzz for a discovering that would gasoline the case for firms making an attempt to deliver staff again to the workplace. It discovered that randomly chosen data-entry staff in Chennai, India have been 18% less-productive working from residence than from the workplace.
But the examine additionally uncovered one other shocking statistic concerning the sorts of staff who choose to do business from home. It discovered that those that choose to do business from home are — at baseline — truly 12% quicker and extra correct of their work.
Nonetheless, the examine discovered that these staff are roughly 27% less-productive at residence than on the workplace. Those that choose to work from the workplace — even when they’re initially slower or less-accurate — are simply 13% less-productive when working from residence.
David Atkin, a professor of economics on the Massachusetts Institute of Expertise and one of many authors of the examine, advised Insider by e-mail that “we discover that these whose productiveness suffers comparatively extra after they do business from home are literally extra possible, not much less, to decide on WFH.”
So why are staff opting to work in settings the place they’re less-productive?
“One clarification for why staff are selecting to work the place they’re much less productive is that the employees who most should be round the home through the workday are precisely the employees who’re most distracted working from residence,” Atkin wrote to Insider. These may embody subsets of staff who must care for kids, are inclined to family tasks through the day, or are from poorer households, a report summarizing the examine’s discovering famous.
Whereas staff’ preferences and circumstances are certain to fluctuate throughout international locations, and industries, the examine’s findings may provide a springboard for firms to design insurance policies that optimize productiveness whereas providing their workers flexibility.
Atkin means that hybrid work preparations could possibly be a solution, although they weren’t explored on this explicit examine.
“I’d speculate that having the ability to WFH a number of days per week, and go the workplace the opposite days, could stability staff’ calls for for WFH with the productiveness prices we discover — and the power to supply face-to-face coaching and group interactions which might be main drivers of productiveness in additional advanced job settings,” he wrote.