On March 26, 2021, White Home digital director Rob Flaherty e-mailed Fb, asking what kind of restrictions the social-media firm was going to placed on the New York Put up.
“I’m curious — NY Put up churning out articles day-after-day about folks dying. What is meant to occur to that from Coverage perspective. Does that article get a discount, labels?”
What we have been “churning out” was the occasional information piece concerning the security and effectiveness of the vaccine primarily based on the knowledge we had on the time (whilst we additionally advocated for taking it in editorials).
So for these retaining rating at residence, social-media censorship of The Put up included:
Saying we couldn’t publish Hunter Biden’s laptop computer as a result of it was pretend or hacked.
It was neither.
Censoring our hypothesis that COVID leaked from a lab.
It almost certainly did.
Attempting to limit our protection of COVID, though we have been advocating for folks to get the vaccine — whereas operating tales concerning the questions everybody was asking.
In order that’s thrice Silicon Valley, underneath stress from the White Home, went after true information.
However “details” aren’t what they’re after.
On the day of Rob Flaherty’s word, The Put up’s entrance web page was “Glazed and Confused,” about President Biden’s apparent psychological issues.
However they don’t need you to examine that.
Or concerning the open border.
Or any of the handfuls of insurance policies this administration tries to maintain quiet.
There’s completely no purpose for the federal government to be pressuring social-media corporations to ban or delete articles and opinions.
It’s pure propaganda and opposite to the spirit of the First Modification.
They’re not defending you.
They’re defending themselves.
